EnginSoft - Modeling and analysis of five-axis tool paths
EnginSoft
22-23 October 2012 Pacengo del Garda
(VR) - Italy

www.caeconference.com

2011 Conference Proceedings
2011 Conference Proceedings are now avaliable to download
2006-2010 Proceedings

download CAE proceedings

CHOOSE YOUR COUNTRY

Virtual Prototyping in Italy Virtual Prototyping in Germany Virtual Prototyping in France
Virtual Prototyping in Spain Virtual Prototyping in Norway Virtual Prototyping in United Kingdom
Other Countries...



Modeling and analysis of five-axis tool paths


In the manufacturing of aerospace components, in-cut machining cycle times of 50-100 h are common. Achieving meaningful reduction of cycle time while maintaining part quality is predicated upon the ability to model the physics of the machining operations.

Five-axis tool paths can result in thousands of cutter orientations with respect to the workpiece and are often used in the machining of complex monolithic aerospace components. It is a complex and expensive undertaking. Among factors making computational procedures expensive are: defining accurate cutter geometries, including the rake angles, corner radii, and helix angles; calculating surface-surface intersections between workpiece and tool geometries as a function of feeds and speeds; and defining workpiece geometries (of the order of several meters) while resolving chip loads (of the order of a few micrometers).

tws courses
Fig.1: Experimental test chip and predicted chip shape as modeled in Third Wave's AdvantEdge FEM 3D.

In addition to complicated tool paths, the machining of titanium alloys and other high-temperature aerospace metals poses additional challenges due to low thermal conductivity, high specific cutting power, and high hardness.

Commercially available verification software products provide methods to optimize the tool paths but do not incorporate material behavior or cutting force prediction. Several empirical models to predict cutting forces in machining processes have been well documented in literature. But these models are not sufficient to simulate the machining of complex aerospace components utilizing five-axis tool paths and predict forces for thousands of cutter locations and dozens of tools in a quick and efficient manner.

However complicated, implementing tool-path analysis into process design can yield a wide range of benefits in many different areas, as researchers from Third Wave have found. With the help of a validated five-axis tool path analysis model that can predict forces at each cutter location, cycle times and scrap can be reduced, and machine breakdown can be avoided, all through off-line analysis. Productivity and process efficiency can be improved through simulation, drastically reducing testing setup and cut time.

Third Wave’s research provides a way to accurately model length scales from chip load (~100 micron), part thickness (~2 mm), and depths of cut (~10 mm) to part dimensions (~10 m). Forces and temperatures are predicted over the entire tool path using analytical and numerical techniques to extend an empirical database to generalized cutting conditions. This semi-empirical model is able to predict torque and cutting forces encountered by the tool for drilling and milling operations. Using the same model, it is also possible to achieve a tangible reduction of cycle time while maintaining part quality.

This article is based on SAE technical paper 2009-01-3131 by S. Garud, T. Marusich, S. Usui, L. Zamorano, and K. Marusich of Third Wave Systems Inc.

For further information on Third Wave Production Module, please, contact us


copyright © 2011 all rights reserved | terms of use | Download EnginSoft Logo | VAT nb IT00599320223